holmes131

though i could be wrong on that but still means nothing to me

just means to me they play better with him in nets doesnt really say much about him

i kinda think thats not really a factor as its a team stat really , hes not the only one on the ice

when price was good he was very good but it only happened once

you wanna remove the ones price wasnt in the league lunquist is 1 year below in 10

you wanna remove the years lunquist was retired ok so he was below 901 4 years out of 8 . not good

yes but what im saying is those r not stellar numbers , there average at best with a few good years

those r reimer or jones numbers lol not a stars

price 4 years 901 save % or lower in 10 years lunquist 2 times in 12 price way over rated

the number r similar but lunquist would win games on his own , only one season i actually saw price steal a game

ya i do lol

there both gonna get in but lundquist was much better than price

price is the most overrated goalie in the history of hockey

how can u say that , price was an ok goalie most of his career with one great year and never won a cup lundquist was one of the best his whole career and never won a cup

if u liked the savoie at 3 what did u think of the firkus at 12 and 13 and no later than 17??

he had im guessing about 27 points charoit , u think he wouldnt get ten more with mcdavid

ben charoit would get the same stats on that team and close on hit pims and blocks too

hes the same caliber as provorov but he has mcdavid and draisitil

nurse is pronger but without talent

real life hockey not pool heiskanen all around is way higher than nurse

heiskanen now is better and was probably better the first game he played in the nhl

half the guy u names arent even the #1 on there team and i said in really hockey not in this pool

i get to about 5 ,though i havent given it much thought

name 10 number 1s hes better than

as a number 1 i dont even think top 20